<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laura Ingraham Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ingraham: &#8220;Obama Has a Maniacal Adherence To The Church of Global Warming.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/02/ingraham-obama-has-a-maniacal-adherence-to-the-church-of-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/02/ingraham-obama-has-a-maniacal-adherence-to-the-church-of-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura's Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess if you are a conservative, you associate scientific consensus with a cult. Next Ingraham will be comparing the majority of Americans who believe in global warming to the followers of Scientology. Then again, we all know Ingraham is &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/02/ingraham-obama-has-a-maniacal-adherence-to-the-church-of-global-warming/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you are a conservative, you associate scientific consensus with a cult. Next Ingraham will be comparing the majority of Americans who believe in global warming to the followers of Scientology. Then again, we all know Ingraham is paid by large corporations who depend on advertising dollars from big oil. These same companies have investments in oil companies and depend on the same tax treatment. Bottom line: Ingraham is a corporate shill. I bet you the Chamber of Commerce is still funding her show.</p>
<p><code><object width='320' height='240'><param name='movie' value='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf'></param><param name='flashvars' value='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201202210002'></param><param name='allowscriptaccess' value='always'></param><param name='allownetworking' value='all'></param><embed src='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201202210002' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='320' height='240'></embed></object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/02/ingraham-obama-has-a-maniacal-adherence-to-the-church-of-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shame on Rachel Maddow!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/shame-on-rachel-maddow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/shame-on-rachel-maddow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura's Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McDonnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may or may not have heard, Rachel Maddow recently thanked Laura Ingraham on her show for helping her interview Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell. It seems that Ingraham suggested to McDonnell that he appear on &#8220;The Rachel Maddow Show&#8221; &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/shame-on-rachel-maddow/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may or may not have heard, Rachel Maddow recently thanked Laura Ingraham on her show for helping her interview Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell. It seems that Ingraham suggested to McDonnell that he appear on &#8220;The Rachel Maddow Show&#8221; as a way to reach out to the other side. When McDonnell opined that he has no way of getting in touch with Maddow, Ingraham said &#8220;I&#8217;ll send her a note.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ingraham and Maddow are cut from the same cloth: they are both part of the Washington elite; both grew up in priviledged backgrounds, and both stand for absolutely nothing. Don&#8217;t be surprised if this relationship goes further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/shame-on-rachel-maddow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Laura Poll!</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/new-laura-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/new-laura-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura's Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC's This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Levin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Laura Ingraham will be appearing on Abc&#8217;s This Week on Sunday. This is not a shocker considering Ingraham has been on this show in the past, but I have a few questions. 1.) Considering Ingraham&#8217;s shock jock &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/new-laura-poll/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Laura Ingraham will be appearing on Abc&#8217;s This Week on Sunday. This is not a shocker considering Ingraham has been on this show in the past, but I have a few questions. 1.) Considering Ingraham&#8217;s shock jock radio program, should she be on any Sunday shows? (Fox does not count) 2.) Many conservatives, including Mark Levin, have said that &#8220;real conservatives&#8221; would never appear as part of the panel on any Sunday shows. What do you think?</p>
<p>Note: A recent study suggests that in 2011, conservative guests out number liberal guests by a 2-to-1 margin. Michelle Malkin and Dana Loesch have both appeared on ABC&#8217;s This Week, which shows you that conservative guests are all over the place.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2012/01/new-laura-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingraham- The Only Person in America Still Defending the Bush Tax Cuts!</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/12/ingraham-the-only-person-in-america-still-defending-the-bush-tax-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/12/ingraham-the-only-person-in-america-still-defending-the-bush-tax-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura's Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'reilly Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight while filling in for Bill O&#8217;reilly on the O&#8217;reilly Factor, Laura Ingraham fasely claimed the Bush tax cuts led to the highest revenue in history. Of course, this is an obvious lie, considering George Bush&#8217;s presidency has given us &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/12/ingraham-the-only-person-in-america-still-defending-the-bush-tax-cuts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight while filling in for Bill O&#8217;reilly on the O&#8217;reilly Factor, Laura Ingraham fasely claimed the Bush tax cuts led to the highest revenue in history. Of course, this is an obvious lie, considering George Bush&#8217;s presidency has given us nothing but debt. For example, when George W. Bush came into office, America was left with a surplus, and national debt of 5.6 trillion dollars. By the time Bush left office, our national debt was at 10.6 trillion.(not including the cost of the two wars.) It doesn&#8217;t take a genuis to see Laura Ingraham is obviously lying. I&#8217;d be willing to bet the Heritage Foundation, or some other right-wing institution came up with this lie. Below is the clip from tonight&#8217;s O&#8217;reilly factor.</p>
<p><code><object width='320' height='240'><param name='movie' value='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf'></param><param name='flashvars' value='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201112210021'></param><param name='allowscriptaccess' value='always'></param><param name='allownetworking' value='all'></param><embed src='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201112210021' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='320' height='240'></embed></object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/12/ingraham-the-only-person-in-america-still-defending-the-bush-tax-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Poll Question!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/new-poll-question-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/new-poll-question-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that Laura Ingraham has an annoying voice. Sometimes her voice sounds like a duck quacking. So my question is, do you think Ingraham is a smoker? What leads me to consider this is the fact that- according &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/new-poll-question-7/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that Laura Ingraham has an annoying voice. Sometimes her voice sounds like a duck quacking. So my question is, do you think Ingraham is a smoker? What leads me to consider this is the fact that- according to my correspondant Jeff Howard-  while on the Don Imus show, she made reference to smoking a Marlboro. And the site Wiki Answers reports that Ingraham and Coulter are both smokers. What do you think??</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/new-poll-question-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Holidays.</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/happy-holidays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/happy-holidays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 21:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all from Laura Ingraham Sucks, Happy Holidays. Expect big things from this site in 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all from Laura Ingraham Sucks, Happy Holidays. Expect big things from this site in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/happy-holidays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingraham Sponsor in Trouble.</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/ingraham-sponsor-in-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/ingraham-sponsor-in-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura's Friends.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingraham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been reporting on some of Ingraham&#8217;s sponsors for years, here. It seems as though one of Laura Ingraham&#8217;s sponsors, Goldline, a company that is the recipient of a 19-count criminal complaint, may not be reputable. We make no allegation &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/ingraham-sponsor-in-trouble/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been reporting on some of Ingraham&#8217;s sponsors for years, here. It seems as though one of Laura Ingraham&#8217;s sponsors, Goldline, a company that is the recipient of a 19-count criminal complaint, may not be reputable. We make no allegation of wrongdoing on the part of Ingraham. However, I find this amusing because Laura Ingraham posted a picture on Facebook of her and some children playing Goldline clips on her radio show. I wonder if Laura will tell these children that they may have been accomplices in defrauding the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/11/ingraham-sponsor-in-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Laura Poll! Laura &amp; Hollywood.</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/new-laura-poll-laura-hollywood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/new-laura-poll-laura-hollywood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off-Air Neurotic Behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know Ingraham loves to rail agaisnt Hollywood. She blames Hollywood for the denigration of our culture. But as they say, actions speak louder than words. According to her Facebook page, Laura visited Malibu this weekend, the same weekend &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/new-laura-poll-laura-hollywood/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know Ingraham loves to rail agaisnt Hollywood. She blames Hollywood for the denigration of our culture. But as they say, actions speak louder than words. According to her Facebook page, Laura visited Malibu this weekend, the same weekend that the Clinton Concert took place in nearby in Los Angeles. Could it be that Ingraham attended this event? I&#8217;d bet money on it. For a person who claims to hate Hollywood, she sure spends a lot of time at the Grammy Awards, or posing with the likes of Ben Affleck. So my question to you is, do you think Laura Ingraham is a fake? I hate right-wing pundits. I would never attend an event, or pose for a picture with one. It&#8217;s pretty hard to imagine someone like Sean Hannity or Mark Levin attending a Hollywood event, or posing with Vice President Biden.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/new-laura-poll-laura-hollywood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinkprogress Hammers Ingraham for Her Racism.</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/thinkprogress-hammers-ingraham-for-her-racism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/thinkprogress-hammers-ingraham-for-her-racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura The Racist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday when I posted this story, I didn&#8217;t have the full quote. It seems that Ingraham believes Obama was an affirmative action selection for America. Here is Thinkprogress&#8217; take on Ingraham&#8217;s race-baiting. By Tanya Somanader on Oct 6, 2011 at &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/thinkprogress-hammers-ingraham-for-her-racism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday when I posted this story, I didn&#8217;t have the full quote. It seems that Ingraham believes Obama was an affirmative action selection for America. Here is Thinkprogress&#8217; take on Ingraham&#8217;s race-baiting. <strong>By Tanya Somanader on Oct 6, 2011 at 7:30 pm</p>
<p>Right-wing radio host and Fox contributor Laura Ingraham makes a living from race-baiting when it comes to the president. Like many of her conservative cohorts, Ingraham often insists that much of Obama’s success is solely derived from the fact that he is African-American. Yesterday on her radio show, Ingraham offered Obama’s rise to the presidency as a perfect example of “the problem with affirmative action.” This is “what happens when individuals get pushed into positions, or elevated to positions for which they’re not qualified,” she said. “People get pushed, pushed, pushed farther than their abilities can match the position, and then they just keep failing.” All “because we had such a yearning for history,” she added<br />
</strong></p>
<p>This is truly offensive because it undermines the first black President. Suggesting Obama got to be president based on his race is ridiculous. Obama lost every single white demographic in 2008, with the exception of the 18-29 year old. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/thinkprogress-hammers-ingraham-for-her-racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingraham Questions Obama&#8217;s Blackness.</title>
		<link>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/ingraham-questions-obamas-blackness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/ingraham-questions-obamas-blackness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laura The Racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/?p=2164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The meme within the racist right is that Obama is not an African American because his mother was white. You&#8217;ll recall, Rush Limbaugh called Obama a &#8220;halfrican American.&#8221; Today on her radio show, racist talkshow host Laura Ingraham suggested Obama &#8230; <a href="http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/ingraham-questions-obamas-blackness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meme within the racist right is that Obama is not an African American because his mother was white. You&#8217;ll recall, Rush Limbaugh called Obama a &#8220;halfrican American.&#8221; Today on her radio show, racist talkshow host Laura Ingraham suggested Obama is not black.</p>
<p>Source: Media Matters Her grasp of race and politics has only grown stronger since then, and today on her radio show she wondered aloud if Herman Cain &#8220;would be the first black president, when you measure it by &#8212; because he doesn&#8217;t &#8212; does he have a white mother, white father, grandparents, no, right?&#8221;</p>
<p><code><object width='320' height='240'><param name='movie' value='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf'></param><param name='flashvars' value='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?f=/static/clips/2011/10/05/20502/trn-ingraham-20111005-firstblackpres.flv'></param><param name='allowscriptaccess' value='always'></param><param name='allownetworking' value='all'></param><embed src='http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?f=/static/clips/2011/10/05/20502/trn-ingraham-20111005-firstblackpres.flv' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='320' height='240'></embed></object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauraingrahamsucks.com/2011/10/ingraham-questions-obamas-blackness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

